Would an open supply route solve Russia's wartime crisis?

Would opening the Dardanelles really save Russia when supply shortages were not its only wartime problem?

Not permanently, but food, ammunition, victory, and the prestige of Constantinople could postpone the crisis and change who held political leverage.

Inadequate supplies were not the only cause of Russia's defeat and revolution. Food, ammunition, working transport, and battlefield success could nevertheless keep the wartime crisis from reaching its 1917 breaking point. Possession of Constantinople could also strengthen the monarchy's claim to defend Orthodox Christianity and might draw Nicholas II and his family away from Petrograd for religious ceremonies. The structural political conflict remains in this scenario, but better material conditions and a different center of royal activity give moderates more room and push the confrontation toward the 1920s.