Q&A · 7:24-7:38

Why Australia did not give Melbourne a STOVL conversion

The missed chance to convert Melbourne for STOVL aircraft is framed as an Australian political decision, not a technical barrier.

Question

Why did the Royal Australian Navy not convert Melbourne for STOVL aircraft as India did with Vikrant?

Short answer

The missed conversion is attributed chiefly to short-sighted decisions by the Australian government.

Notes

The question compares HMAS Melbourne with India's later conversion of the Majestic-class carrier Vikrant for Sea Harrier operations. The missed opportunity is blamed on short-sighted decisions by the Australian government. This makes the end of Australian fixed-wing carrier aviation a policy choice rather than proof that the hull could not be adapted. A separate later answer concerns potential Admiral-class fleet carriers and should not be confused with Melbourne's case.