Q&A ยท 2:07:12-2:07:29

Reading the demon imagery in Procopius's Secret History

A brief answer treats Procopius's lurid descriptions of Justinian and Theodora as imagery rather than literal reporting.

Question

How should historians read the demon imagery in Procopius's Secret History?

Short answer

As imagery rather than a literal description, although this brief answer does not explain the work's full reception history.

Notes

A viewer contrasts Procopius's praise of Justinian's reign with the Secret History's depiction of Justinian and Theodora as demons, including detachable-head imagery. The answer is deliberately brief: those descriptions are imagery rather than literal reporting. This identifies the language as rhetoric rather than a factual description. The passage does not explain how later historians assessed or debated the work.