Why a navalised Typhoon must justify its hangar space

Would a navalised Hawker Typhoon be worthwhile as a British carrier strike aircraft?

Probably not unless it displaced another type with a clear capability gain, because it did not meet the carrier group's dive-bomber or torpedo-strike needs.

A navalised Typhoon would impose its own hangar and logistics burden. The answer asks whether it could replace the fighter, dive bomber, or Barracuda torpedo-strike role and concludes that its historical bombing and rocket strengths do not fill the dive-bomber requirement.