Q&A · 2:08:18-2:09:05

Why missile-era alternate warships are harder to design

Gun mountings can often be treated as relatively self-contained substitutions, while missile systems depend on ship-wide radars, combat direction, power, and control links.

Question

Why are pre-missile warships easier to redesign in alternate history than missile-age ships?

Short answer

Because missile weapons are deeply integrated with sensors, command systems, power, and controls across the ship, while gun mountings are comparatively interchangeable and better documented.

Notes

Pre-missile warships are easier to redesign in alternate history because their equipment is better documented and their guns are comparatively interchangeable. A gun mounting forms a mostly vertical installation with control links back to the firing computer. Missile systems connect to radar, the combat information center, fire control and power services distributed around the vessel. Substituting a missile system can therefore require changes across much of the ship, while classified details make those changes harder to reconstruct.