Q&A · 29:53-34:49

Helicopter AEW versus fixed-wing AWACS

A Royal Navy air-defence question compares Merlin Crowsnest with the fixed-wing E-2 Hawkeye and explains the Falklands lesson.

Question

Is the Royal Navy dangerously under-equipped because its carriers lack fixed-wing AWACS aircraft?

Short answer

Fixed-wing AWACS offers greater reach and control, but helicopter AEW still provides useful fleet warning and would have been especially valuable in the Falklands War.

Notes

Merlin Crowsnest and its Sea King predecessor provide airborne early warning for the Royal Navy's carriers. The criticism concerns helicopter altitude, range and radar size compared with fixed-wing aircraft such as the E-2 Hawkeye. Airborne warning and control systems also accompany and direct strike aircraft. Helicopter systems have some control capability, but cannot keep up with those aircraft and primarily support fleet air defence. They can position themselves usefully around mountainous terrain, including Norway and Scandinavia. At the time of this recording, China's shipborne warning aircraft were helicopters such as the Ka-31, while its fixed-wing warning aircraft operated ashore. Having AEW helicopters available with Hermes and Invincible before the Falklands campaign would have saved lives and changed the system's reputation. The Sea Harrier illustrates how wartime service can shape public assessments without making an older aircraft superior to its successor. Helicopter AEW subsequently proved useful in Iraq, the Gulf Wars and Afghanistan.