Why might glider assault forces compare favorably with paratroops and helicopter assault forces?
Short answerGliders can be cheap and effective, while parachutes offer greater range and helicopters provide more precise, reusable insertion.
NotesGlider assault forces could be cheaper and more successful for some missions than parachute or helicopter forces. Paratroops retain an advantage in range, allowing insertion farther from supporting bases. Helicopters offer more accurate delivery and can be reused across an operation. The comparison judges airborne methods by mission distance, precision, cost, and repeatability.