Q&A ยท 2:15:22-2:16:36

Why smaller navies cannot simply choose bigger ships

A larger hull can be economical at sea yet unaffordable if a navy lacks the shore facilities to sustain it.

Question

If steel and hull volume are relatively cheap, why have navies chosen smaller mainline warships?

Short answer

The limiting cost is often shore infrastructure: yards, ports, and dry docks must be large enough to build and maintain the ship.

Notes

Norway's inability to accept the enlarged monitor Gorgon after World War I illustrates a limit imposed by shore facilities. The account explains that wartime bulges made the hull too large for the available Norwegian dry docks. A ship could therefore be useful and still be impractical for its intended navy. Dock dimensions and the cost of expanding facilities belong in the comparison alongside the hull itself.