Q&A ยท 4:06:47-4:10:47

Why short-war assumptions can force nuclear escalation

Designing a fleet to exhaust its conventional weapons in days can make nuclear use more likely by removing every other means of continuing the war.

Question

Are navies still suffering from the belief that a major war will end within days through nuclear escalation?

Short answer

Yes; shallow conventional magazines can make nuclear escalation more likely by leaving no viable way to continue fighting after the first days.

Notes

The panel argues that the assumption of an immediate nuclear ending still distorts public and political thinking about conventional endurance. If ships cannot reload vertical-launch cells and magazines are sized for only a few days, the conventional force may be destroyed or exhausted before diplomacy ends the conflict. Leaders then face a choice between accepting defeat and relying on nuclear threats. Deep stocks, reloadable systems, and resilient conventional forces therefore support deterrence by preserving alternatives to escalation.