Constellation shows how good requirements accumulate

The Constellation procurement critique starts with two stated aims: Oliver Hazard Perry-like cost and construction efficiency, and the capability of a smaller Arleigh Burke. A proven foreign parent design was intended to make that combination attainable. Successive changes then applied additional American requirements and Burke-derived standards. The account links their accumulated cost, delay, and complexity to cancellation. It treats the individual decisions as well-intentioned while questioning their combined effect. The replacement ship is judged against Perry-level capability and described as falling below that personal baseline for a frigate.