Q&A · 1:49:00-1:49:13

Why Colorado's turbo-electric drive disappointed

The US Navy expected turbo-electric propulsion to solve competing machinery demands and was surprised when its fuel economy compared poorly with geared steam turbines.

Question

Was the US Navy surprised by the Colorado class's poor turbo-electric fuel efficiency?

Short answer

Yes. It expected the system to outperform the compromise it replaced and discovered that it did not.

Notes

The American navy did not anticipate the relative inefficiency of Colorado's turbo-electric machinery. Planners expected the system to reconcile competing propulsion requirements. Operational fuel performance showed that the apparent solution had not actually squared the circle. Innovative machinery must be judged by realised efficiency rather than theoretical elegance.