Bismarck's cost and continuity in shipbuilding

Why could another battleship cost less than Bismarck?

Retained infrastructure and continuous shipbuilding experience could lower costs abroad. German industrial rebuilding, engineering complexity and corruption are proposed contributors to Bismarck's higher cost.

Continuous shipbuilding after the First World War preserved experience and infrastructure that could make later battleships cheaper to construct. In the cost comparison with Bismarck, Germany instead faces the expense of rebuilding industrial capacity rapidly. Engineering complexity is another proposed contributor to Bismarck's higher cost. A further contribution is attributed to corruption under the Nazi regime. The comparison ship's name is unclear, and no prices are supplied, so the size of the claimed cost difference cannot be assessed from this exchange.