Why are there doubts about availability under the CCV and T9X plan?
Short answerUnplaced orders, cancelled programmes, and deliberately slow construction make a worked-up system by 2034 difficult to reconcile with the available time.
NotesThe proposed timetable depends on orders that had not yet been placed when this discussion took place. Two existing programmes had been cancelled, while the replacement system was supposed to be worked up by 2034. The nine-year Type 26 construction timeline gives a warning about what slow funding can do to delivery dates. Paying a yard to build slowly can reduce expenditure in one budget year while increasing the programme's total cost. The discussion links the promised timetable to the orders, construction pace, and funding needed to deliver it.