Q&A ยท 3:42:49-3:44:15

Why Italy's future destroyer needs missile depth

The Italian destroyer proposal prompts a comparison of missile capacity and the different carrier arrangements of France and Italy.

Question

How would Mediterranean navies react to an Italian 14,000-ton destroyer with 86 VLS cells, four 76 mm guns in twin mounts, 40 mm weapons, and two medium helicopters?

Short answer

The panel sees it as close to the Italian future-destroyer concept, while querying the cell count and gun mounts and expecting a larger missile battery. It relates that capacity to Italy's reliance on surface ships for offensive power.

Notes

The hypothetical ship is compared with the Italian future-destroyer concept as understood at the time of the discussion. The figure of 86 VLS cells is questioned because the launchers discussed come in groups of eight, suggesting that 96 may have been intended. The expectation for the Italian concept is closer to 120 cells, while the four 76 mm guns are expected to be in single mounts. These remain estimates. France's surface forces are compared with Italy's through their different carrier arrangements: France plans around a large carrier, whereas Italian surface combatants are expected to provide more of the fleet's offensive weight. That role explains the emphasis on missile capacity.