Q&A · 4:22:39-4:24:20

Des Moines rapid fire against battlecruisers and battleships

The answer separates volume-of-fire advantage from armor and shell-weight asymmetry in a cruiser-versus-capital-ship fight.

Question

How much advantage did Des Moines gain from rapid fire, and which battleships would be less desirable than the cruiser?

Short answer

Rapid, radar-directed eight-inch fire makes Des Moines dangerous to a battlecruiser that fails to score early. The answer still favours contemporary battleships because their protection and heavy shells outweigh the cruiser's rate of fire.

Notes

A battlecruiser that misses its opening salvo could be overwhelmed by Des Moines' radar-directed volume of fire. The answer nevertheless favours battleships that overlapped the cruiser's service, because they could absorb cruiser-calibre hits while their own heavy shells remained dangerous to her. Even an older ship with 15-inch guns is treated as a serious threat. Most battleships considered weak enough to favour Des Moines had already left service before the cruiser appeared. This is a judgement about unequal protection and gun power, not a prediction that every hit would have the same result.