Diplomatic presence and perceptions of Pacific naval power

How would you dispel the idea that the US Navy has lost its Pacific hegemony to China?

The proposed response is sustained visible engagement; diplomatic perceptions are distinguished from proof that China has displaced US naval strength.

Alex Clarke distinguishes a perception of Chinese predominance from demonstrated displacement of American naval capability. He attributes some Pacific states' perceptions to more consistent Chinese diplomatic engagement, visits and investment. The examples include tourism projects drawing on overseas finance and construction, alongside island states' concern about sea-level rise. His proposed response is sustained engagement that makes a country's presence visible. This is his interpretation of the diplomatic competition in December 2025, rather than a finding that China had replaced US naval power.