Why an experienced operator may distrust an apparently normal pattern

Can you explain why a human might notice a problem that a drone's computer misses?

The example is suspiciously consistent information: an experienced person may question it even when each individual reading appears acceptable.

An experienced operator can become uneasy when information repeats with an implausible degree of consistency. Something feels wrong before the operator can fully describe why. That reaction is contrasted with a computer accepting inputs that meet its learned rules. The comparison illustrates the proposed value of experience, without proving that all automated systems lack anomaly detection.