Reliable British shells at Jutland

What if the Royal Navy solved its armor-piercing shell problems after Dogger Bank?

Jutland becomes far deadlier for Germany because more damaged ships could be finished or fail to reach port.

Shell behaviour is a single technical change with large operational consequences. British armour-piercing shells often broke up or detonated on contact instead of carrying their effect through German armour. Substituting the improved 1918 pattern would leave already damaged German ships slower, more vulnerable, and less likely to reach port. Metallurgy and fuze behaviour could turn marginal escapes into decisive losses without changing fleet positions or gun numbers.