Where should Britain put an extra £200 million as the treaty system breaks down?
Short answerIn 1937 he would prioritize a reliable 4.5-inch dual-purpose mounting and armor production, but says investment in 1932-33 would have transformed capacity far more.
NotesTwo years is too little time to create industrial buildings, complete major warships, and remove bottlenecks before war begins. Earlier investment after abandonment of the Ten Year Rule could have expanded armor production, reduced King George V delays, and kept heavier-gun development alive. Naval readiness depends on industrial lead time rather than emergency money alone.