Notable Point · 29:54-32:16

Beatty and RAF control block an otherwise plausible carrier policy

Institutional confidence and procurement conservatism help explain why Britain did not turn a plausible small-carrier design into a sustained programme.

Notes

Political decisions present the main obstacle because the design itself is plausible. In this interpretation, David Beatty remained preoccupied with First World War problems and believed his influence could compel the new Royal Air Force to meet naval requirements. His emphasis on night fighting nevertheless proved useful for the Royal Navy in the Second World War. His confidence helped make the transfer of the Royal Naval Air Service, including carrier aviation and long-range patrol duties, seem manageable. Beatty also wanted to save money and avoid provoking another naval race, limiting the freedom of later First Sea Lords to innovate. Those priorities conflicted with Britain's dependence on maritime power and overseas access.