What might Australia's new nuclear-powered submarine look like?
Short answerAn Astute-derived design with a new reactor and vertical-launch section is plausible because American construction capacity is constrained.
NotesAmerican yards were already committed to Virginia-class attack submarines and Columbia-class ballistic-missile submarines. Diverting capacity to Australia could worsen the US Navy's own submarine shortfall. Early Australian boats would also need to be built in an experienced British or American yard while the domestic workforce and facilities matured. At the time of the discussion, the British production line was described as having two spare positions, making it the more practical starting point. An Astute-derived hull with a newer reactor and vertical-launch section could provide an evolutionary design rather than an entirely new submarine.