Arleigh Burke Flights I and III illustrate major technological changes within one named class. The criticism is that their equipment developed much further than the underlying design and architecture. Successive upgrades required later systems to work within arrangements not originally designed to support them. The case for a replacement rests on providing a hull whose design supports the infrastructure required by newer systems more efficiently.
Notable Point · 44:45-45:29
Arleigh Burke upgrades within an inherited design
The Arleigh Burke comparison explains the argument for a replacement hull architecture to support newer systems more efficiently.