Argentina's procurement was better than its command system

How would competent Argentine procurement from the 1960s change the force that fought the Falklands War?

The inventory might remain broadly similar, but better command and a larger number of genuinely operational submarines would make the force more dangerous.

The quality of Argentina's purchases should be separated from the way its armed forces were led. Argentina largely bought suitable American equipment, so a competent nonpolitical procurement team would not necessarily create a radically different inventory. The deeper weakness lay in military command and coordination. With foreknowledge of a war against Britain, the clearest procurement change would be more submarines actually in operational service rather than merely nominally available.