Boyd's naval-intelligence history and crowded notes

Are the notes in Andrew Boyd's new book badly laid out?

The difficulty is attributed to the amount of information packed into the book, while the recommendation remains strongly favourable.

An audience criticism of the notes in Boyd's naval-intelligence book prompts a different diagnosis: unusually dense information rather than poor arrangement. The recommendation remains strongly favourable. The amount of material is judged sufficient for four substantial books. That density can make the volume demanding to use while also accounting for its appeal as a reference.