How often should amphibious readiness be reviewed?

The proposed amphibious force readiness board would meet quarterly to address maintenance, life extensions, and procurement. A crisis lasting several months could therefore overlap only a few scheduled meetings. The review proposes a more frequent timetable so senior officials repeatedly confront the state of the force. Type 23 service extensions illustrate how keeping old ships available can become a reason to defer replacements. Regular attention is intended to expose accumulating wear before a sudden shortage forces urgent decisions. A standing monthly meeting could be cancelled when unnecessary while preserving time in senior leaders' calendars.