Q&A · 1:24:01-1:25:43

Could Alaska-class ships have become missile cruisers?

The large Alaska hull offered room and stability for missiles, but early conversion technology still favoured retaining some guns and using less ambitious arrangements.

Question

What if Alaska-class large cruisers had been the basis for US missile cruisers?

Short answer

They could have carried substantial missile fits, but contemporary technology would likely produce hybrid gun-and-missile conversions rather than a clean modern VLS ship.

Notes

The Alaska hull had the beam and reserve stability to carry substantial topweight, making a large missile conversion physically attractive. Without mature vertical-launch systems, however, the Navy would need trainable launchers and extensive reconstruction rather than a modern flush-deck arsenal. The speakers imagine retaining the forward heavy guns while replacing the after battery with missiles, although a more radical hybrid arrangement is also possible. Keeping large cruisers in service could normalize that scale of combatant and give the later nuclear strike-cruiser proposal an easier institutional path. The result would be a very powerful missile cruiser, but not simply an Alaska filled with contemporary VLS cells.