What was wrong with the Alaska class?
Short answerThe ships were capable large cruisers, but by 1944 the surface threat to carrier groups had faded; they would have been far more valuable in 1940-42.
NotesThe class combined high speed, long range, heavy antiaircraft fire, and 12-inch guns able to dominate enemy cruisers and pocket battleships. By entry into service, however, Iowa-class battleships and screens already covered the carrier groups and the relevant enemy surface threat had declined, making Alaska roughly four years late.