Q&A ยท 2:33:24-2:34:28

Why the Tigers sailed without Bofors

A viewer asks why the Royal Navy appeared to abandon 40 mm guns on its new cruisers.

Question

Why did the Royal Navy give up 40 mm guns on the Tiger class?

Short answer

It did not abandon Bofors; the ships were fitted for them but not with them because omitting the guns reduced completion cost.

Notes

The Navy had not rejected Bofors; it continued fitting them elsewhere and reserved mounting spaces on the Tigers. Those empty positions remained visible around the superstructure and could have accepted guns quickly if required. The automatic three- and six-inch batteries already looked formidable enough on paper to support a gun-only argument. Leaving the 40 mm weapons out therefore saved money under the cheapest completion option, while fitting them would have moved the ship toward the medium-cost proposal.