Q&A · 39:12-39:41

Why a return to coal failed the manpower test

The apparent fuel-security appeal of coal foundered on the extra sailors needed to handle and burn it aboard ship.

Question

Was a 1930s proposal to return the Royal Navy to coal seriously considered?

Short answer

Some politicians supported it, but the extra crews required for coal made oil firing the practical choice.

Notes

Some interwar politicians favoured returning Royal Navy ships to domestic coal, but naval officers immediately raised the manpower cost. Coaling and operating coal-fired ships required far larger crews than oil-fired machinery. A government seeking economy was unwilling to fund those additional sailors. The short exchange shows why propulsion choices cannot be assessed by fuel price or national supply alone.