Q&A · 1:45:13-1:50:24

Why the 10-inch gun is an awkward naval compromise

A 10-inch gun incurs much of a battleship weapon's handling burden without matching a larger gun's power or a 9.2-inch weapon's rate of fire.

Question

Why would Britain avoid a 10-inch gun on its hypothetical large cruiser?

Short answer

It combines battleship-gun handling penalties with less power than a larger weapon and a slower rate of fire than a 9.2-inch gun.

Notes

The 10-inch gun is an awkward middle choice for a British large cruiser. Shells and machinery at that scale already carry many of the handling and loading penalties associated with 12- or 14-inch weapons. The gun still lacks the hitting power of the larger calibres. A 9.2-inch alternative can fire materially faster, leaving the 10-inch system with few compensating advantages despite its attractive position on paper.