Q&A · 3:34:10-3:36:00

When does a battlecruiser concept make sense?

A discussion of future battlecruisers distinguishes a long-range cruiser with capital-ship weapons from a fast battleship with a fashionable label.

Question

Could the battlecruiser concept ever return?

Short answer

It could return where a long-range independent cruiser needs capital-grade weapons; that is different from simply calling a fast battleship a battlecruiser.

Notes

The proposed definition follows the HMS Tiger example: a ship intended for long-range cruising that carries capital-ship-grade weapons. A capital ship designed mainly for speed belongs closer to the fast-battleship category. The Kirovs provide an existing reason for the battlecruiser label to persist, while Stargate's Daedalus class supplies a fictional comparison. Space operations could give the combination of independent cruising and heavy armament a renewed purpose.