The wars-of-choice assumption treats future conflict as something the stronger powers can decide to enter on their own timetable. Under that assumption, equipment and readiness could be expanded when a war was chosen. Confidence in superior technology also reduces the apparent need for large inventories in this explanation. The resulting criticism connects slow procurement and smaller orders with weak reserves and an overworked force. Continual pressure to cut another capability is presented as a consequence of preparing for optional wars.
Chapter · 1:02:31-1:05:09
Wars of choice as an assumption behind slow procurement
The critique links assumptions about optional future wars with slow orders, limited reserves, and an overworked force.