Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Q&A · 2:30:55-2:31:19

Why the Warrior class was not a dreadnought armoured cruiser

Warrior showed features leading toward dreadnought-era design, but lacked the later type's capital-ship-calibre armament and should remain a transitional armoured cruiser.

Armoured CruisersDreadnoughtsNaval GunneryShip ClassificationWarrior Class Armoured Cruisers
Watch at this timeFull video guide
Question

Were the Warrior-class armoured cruisers effectively dreadnought armoured cruisers?

Short answer

No. They helped develop the later pattern, but they predated the type and lacked capital-ship-calibre armament.

Notes

The Warrior-class ships adopted features and proportions that pointed toward the dreadnought era, but they were not dreadnought armoured cruisers. A later category should not be projected backward solely because an earlier design helped develop its shape. More importantly, the Warriors did not carry capital-ship-calibre guns. Their transitional design language did not meet the armament and type criteria of the later category.