Should von Spee have taken his whole squadron into Port Stanley?
Short answerThe smaller ships lacked coal for prolonged flight, while an intact base left no safe route home. These constraints help explain the attack without settling whether committing every ship would have succeeded.
NotesThe smaller cruisers carried less coal than the larger ships, limiting the squadron's alternatives. Leaving the Falklands base intact would expose the homeward voyage to continuing British pursuit. The presence of von Spee's two sons also weighs against interpreting his decision as a reckless disregard for the risks. On this reading, attacking the Falklands was the only viable route home, although success depended on what British forces had already reached the islands.