Trump-class naming and fleet requirements across administrations

Could the Trump class continue after Trump if it were presented as a cruiser replacement rather than a battleship?

The exchange distinguishes the fleet requirement from the class name; it does not establish the program's eventual continuation.

The question concerns the relationship between the Trump-class name and the requirement for a new US large surface combatant. The discussion compares the proposed ship's role with that of a cruiser and places it alongside continued Arleigh Burke construction. It separates the naming question from decisions about the fleet's next large combatant. The later exchange discusses elections and campaigning without establishing which administration will make those decisions or whether construction will continue.