Sweden's position was far from ideal, but it had invested enough to keep its equipment reasonably modern and dependable. Its degree of mobilization also made an attack less attractive. Norway offered a valuable strategic prize at an apparently acceptable military risk. Norwegian leaders underestimated that value and overstated the practical strength of their defences. Reservists who challenged those assumptions could be dismissed as special interests while political debate continued on the premise that Norway would avoid the war.
Notable Point · 36:28-38:02
Swedish readiness made invasion look less attractive
Sweden's imperfect but maintained equipment and mobilized forces raised the apparent cost of invasion, while Norway's advertised strength concealed inadequate readiness.