Q&A ยท 5:36:47-5:38:36

Skjold patrol limits and a proposed CB90 amphibious role

Skjold's coastal role differs from River-class patrol duties, while CB90 boats are proposed as escorts for longer amphibious approaches.

Question

Could a Skjold-type ship replace Royal Navy OPVs?

Short answer

Skjold is judged too coastal and costly for the patrol role; CB90 boats are suggested separately for landing-craft escort and fire support.

Notes

River-class OPVs are valued here for low cost, small crews, and the ability to remain far from Britain. Skjold's specialized coastal combat role makes it a poor substitute for those patrol duties. A separate proposal is to carry CB90 combat boats aboard future amphibious ships. They could escort landing craft over the longer journey from ships operating farther offshore, with a NEMO mortar suggested for fire support. A follow-up warns that adding weapons and protection can steadily enlarge such craft, recreating the demands once placed on destroyers near the coast.