Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Q&A · 16:56-21:14

Did the Scharnhorst class change history more than other capital ships?

The Scharnhorsts were important, but carriers in the Pacific and earlier statement ships such as HMS Warrior offer stronger claims to changing naval history.

Aircraft CarriersCapital ShipsHMS Warrior (1860)Scharnhorst Class Battleships
Watch at this timeFull video guide
Question

Has one capital-ship class moved history as much as the Scharnhorst class?

Short answer

The Scharnhorsts mattered, but Pacific carriers and transformational ships such as HMS Warrior have stronger claims.

Notes

Fame and the volume of writing about a ship are poor measures of historical effect. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau did substantial work for Germany, but Pacific carriers receive stronger support as ships that changed naval warfare. Their wartime operations established naval aviation as a primary striking arm that could no longer be dismissed as scouting support. HMS Warrior and Black Prince broaden the comparison: an ironclad frigate could also be a capital ship. Sailing first rates likewise made a statement through deployment, illustrated by a Russian hundred-gun ship that few Baltic opponents could match. Britain's much larger supply of built and captured warships gave it a different scale of power to deploy.