How should Sharkey Ward's critique of the Ministry of Defence and government politics be read?
Short answerIt is a valuable and well-argued case, but its conclusions still require independent historical judgement rather than unquestioning endorsement.
NotesThe assessment draws on reading Ward's book and discussing naval aviation directly with him. His critique of the Ministry of Defence and government politics is treated as a serious and interesting case. Respect for Ward's experience does not require accepting every point without qualification. The exchange models how a historian can value a participant's forceful testimony while retaining independent judgement about its interpretation.