Q&A · 1:33:58-1:34:20

Why Hood did not receive all-or-nothing armour

Hood's protection scheme was fixed while designers still feared high-explosive damage outside the main armoured citadel.

Question

Why did the Royal Navy not adopt an all-or-nothing armour scheme for Hood?

Short answer

Designers still feared high-explosive damage when the choice was open, and the ship was too advanced to change once that concern receded.

Notes

Hood's armour differed from the all-or-nothing approach used in the Lexington design for two reasons. British designers still worried about the effect of high-explosive shells on unarmoured portions of a ship when changes remained practical. Experience and testing later weakened that concern. By then, Hood's construction was too far advanced for a fundamental redesign.