What went wrong with the 5.25-inch gun, and why did the Royal Navy choose it?
Short answerIt was an attempt to combine cruiser-gun reach with heavy anti-aircraft fire after a rapid-firing six-inch solution proved impractical.
NotesThe 5.25-inch gun was a compromise. It was more powerful than a destroyer's weapon and intended to reach further in the heavy anti-aircraft role. The Navy would have preferred a rapid-firing six-inch dual-purpose answer, but could not make that concept practical. Working downward to 5.25 inches helps explain both the Dido's attraction and its operational compromises.