Why naval patronage was not simple cronyism

Historical patronage differed from cronyism because a patron was supposed to identify people whose performance would improve the patron's standing. Family gatherings, letters, and social connections helped show that a candidate could safely be recommended. Favors still mattered, but they were expected to open a door for someone able to repay the confidence through performance. Because the Navy's effectiveness and a sponsor's reputation were at stake, the institution had incentives to correct at least some poor selections.