Hyde Parker's methodical temperament and obedience to orders contrasted with Horatio Nelson's forceful operational style. Parker suited a campaign intended to leave time for negotiation and let League members reconsider their position. Nelson, the victor of the Nile, supplied the aggressive fighting capacity if diplomacy failed. Placing Parker in overall command kept the limited political aim prominent. Making Nelson second-in-command ensured that the fleet still had a commander able to force the issue at Copenhagen.
Notable Point · 29:39-33:21
Parker's diplomacy and Nelson's fighting role
Hyde Parker was selected for a controlled, diplomatic campaign while Nelson supplied the aggressive fighting capacity if diplomacy failed.