Q&A ยท 2:00:11-2:01:30

Reading Orel memoir claims with caution

A question about Orel and Borodino reconstruction proposals leads to a caution about assigning credit and blame from memoirs alone.

Question

Were the reconstruction proposals attributed to Orel's engineer adopted, and could they have changed the Borodino-class ships' vulnerability?

Short answer

No firm verdict is offered because memoirs can overstate personal credit and shift blame after the fact.

Notes

The answer draws on several Russian accounts from the Tsushima period, including material worked through outside English translation. It gives no firm verdict on the proposed reconstruction and warns that memoirs often claim credit for good decisions while shifting blame for bad ones. Disputed naval-design anecdotes need corroboration beyond a single participant's account. That caution matters when Orel's survival encourages explanations for why her sister ships were lost.