Q&A · 2:51:48-2:52:51

Why the 1890s United States needed a fleet as well as forts

The length of the American coastline made mobile sea control more important than relying on local coastal defences alone.

Question

Could the United States defend its 1890s coastline with forts or coastal-defence ships alone?

Short answer

No; it needed an oceanic fleet to control the main approaches, backed by forts and local ships as a final defensive layer.

Notes

The length of the American coastline made control of its approaches a fleet task. Sailing ships, and some steamships using tides and currents, converged on particular routes and trade points. An ocean-going force could hold those positions and intercept an enemy before it reached the coast. Forts and coastal-defence ships would then provide a second layer if an enemy fleet broke through.