The counterfactual remains open. The northern force had no settled landing point, so it might have come ashore as far from Newcastle as Tate's troops landed from Bristol. That comparison redirects attention from battlefield strength to the distance between beachhead and objective, resistance along the route, and the supplies needed to sustain a march. The question applies these amphibious-planning lessons without turning an unrealised possibility into a claim about historical fact.
Notable Point · 1:04:33-1:05:29
Could the Newcastle diversion have done any better?
The closing question asks viewers to test the aborted Newcastle landing against the same geographic and logistical weakness that doomed the Welsh diversion.