Armstrong recalls a colleague investigating why American universities had removed or repurposed chairs in naval history. At one unnamed Ivy League institution, a department head reportedly dismissed naval history as settled because its wars and battles had already been studied. That secondhand anecdote illustrates a narrow view of the field, while the wider loss of academic posts limits opportunities for naval historians. Social and political history broaden the subject, and much remains to investigate within military institutions themselves: how technology is created, tactics and operational art develop, and personnel learn their profession. Mark Folse's and Heather Venable's studies of the US Marine Corps provide examples of work on the development of service culture, leadership and innovation. Clarke also sees practical reasons to teach across periods, because recurring naval problems and the small number of specialists leave gaps when the field is divided too narrowly.
Chapter · 1:41:02-1:48:15
Naval history beyond battle narratives
Naval institutions offer historical questions about the development of technology, operational methods, education and service culture that battle narratives alone cannot answer.