The French Navy's competence made the prospect of its ships entering hostile hands especially serious for Britain. The argument locates British distrust in the French government after its break with the alliance, even while respecting the Navy itself. Earlier promises to keep fighting had failed, so further assurances about the fleet did not restore confidence. Poor communication about the government's actions compounded the problem. This interpretation explains the attack through fear of political control over a capable fleet while recognising that Britain was attacking a former ally.
Notable Point · 4:23:41-4:24:41
Mers-el-Kebir and distrust of the French government
The explanation for Britain's attack distinguishes respect for French naval competence from distrust of the government controlling the fleet.