Q&A · 32:24-33:33

Why a postwar Lion still needs nine 16-inch guns

A roughly 62,000-ton Lion-class battleship would remain close to the historical design rather than trade its nine 16-inch guns for a much lighter battery.

Question

If Britain built the Lion class after the war at roughly 65,000 tons, what armament and performance would be realistic?

Short answer

Something close to the planned Lion: about 62,000 tons, nine 16-inch guns, and roughly 28 knots, because six 14-inch guns would be too little for such a large ship.

Notes

The answer argues that a postwar Lion should retain the planned nine 16-inch guns and roughly 28-knot speed. A displacement around 62,000 to 65,000 tons does not itself require a radically different ship. Arming a vessel of that size with only six 14-inch guns would leave it badly undergunned for its cost and capability. The answer treats armament as part of a balanced design rather than a feature that can be reduced independently of displacement.