Face-to-face leadership of a small team differs from the organizational work required to direct hundreds, thousands, or millions of people. An officer can struggle at one scale yet possess the judgment and delegation skills needed at a much higher level. Interwar navies had enough ships and institutional depth to retain some imperfect junior commanders, examine whether a mistake reflected incompetence or overload, and give promising officers another role. That tolerance helped produce wartime admirals whose early records were uneven. The argument still assumes that officers learn the profession from below; uneven performance at one command scale does not remove the need for institutional knowledge. Grounding a destroyer did not merit reward, but one kind of command performance was not the only measure of future ability.
Notable Point ยท 1:28:35-1:35:01
Leadership at ship, squadron, and theater level demands different skills
Weak junior performance need not predict failure in senior command, and large forces can preserve officers long enough to reveal where they excel.